Lourd and Huvane further advised Ormond not to discuss what had transpired, “because he would sue her for libel.” If she retained a lawyer and attempted a settlement, she says, they told her she would get only about $100,000, “which they apparently believed was the going rate for being sexually assaulted by Harvey Weinstein.” When she told them of the alleged assault, Ormond claims that Lourd and Huvane “focused on the assault from Weinstein’s perspective, asking Ormond whether Weinstein might have believed that Ormond had consented, and suggested that it was Weinstein’s perception of the event - not Ormond’s actual lack of consent - that legally mattered.” They also told her that she might not be believed if she went to the police, and warned, “She risked further angering Weinstein, who could be even more punitive.” Read more: Top Hollywood talent agency accused of tolerating sexual harassment, misconduct “Horrified,” according to the suit, she called her agents at CAA, Lourd and Huvane, to “plead with them to prevent Weinstein from coming to Copenhagen.” They declined to intervene, the suit states. Once there, Ormond, who was “inebriated” to the point she could not put the keys in the door, says despite her protests, Weinstein “stripped naked,” forced her to give him a massage, climbed on top of her, masturbated and then forced her “to perform oral sex on him.”Ī few weeks after the alleged assault, Ormond traveled to Copenhagen to work on a film and was informed that Weinstein planned to visit her. … Rest assured, we will expose the real facts.”Ī representative for Disney was not immediately available for comment.Īccording to the complaint, first reported by Variety, Weinstein insisted on discussing the project at the Manhattan apartment Miramax provided for the English actor, part of her two-year, first-look deal with the company. It’s not surprising, therefore, that she found nothing to support our client’s claims. Wigdor, founding partner of the New York law firm Wigdor Law who is representing Ormond, responded: “CAA admits that they hired Loretta Lynch to ‘defend’ them. Ormond’s attorneys also asked CAA to pay $15 million in exchange for Ormond not making public allegations against the agency, which it rejected, CAA said.ĭouglas H. The Century City-based agency then hired attorney Loretta Lynch and her law firm Paul Weiss, and the firm’s review “found nothing to support Ms. Ormond has levied against the agency are completely without merit.”ĬAA said Ormond’s counsel approached the talent agency in March about the allegations. Ormond and the experience she described in her complaint,” the talent agency said in a statement. “CAA takes all allegations of sexual assault and abuse seriously, and has compassion for Ms. Ormond’s claims,” said his attorney, Imran H. Weinstein after the passing of decades, and he is confident that the evidence will not support Ms. This is yet another example of a complaint filed against Mr. “Harvey Weinstein categorically denies the allegations made against him by Julia Ormond and he is prepared to vehemently defend himself. “Brazenly, none of these prominent companies warned Ormond that Weinstein had a history of assaulting women because he was too important, too powerful, and made them too much money.” So too did Weinstein’s employers at Miramax and Disney,” the lawsuit states. “The men at CAA who represented Ormond knew about Weinstein. Read more: Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 16 years in prison for Los Angeles rape However, their names are cited throughout the complaint. Lourd and Huvane are not named as defendants in the suit. Ormond, who starred in such films as “Legends of the Fall” and the remake of “Sabrina,” alleges that Weinstein sexually assaulted her in December 1995 after a business dinner in New York City, where the two were to discuss a project.įurther, Ormond contends that after she informed her agents Bryan Lourd and Kevin Huvane, currently CAA’s co-chairmen, they did nothing to help her and instead cautioned her about speaking out. and Miramax, accusing them of negligent supervision and retention. ![]() ![]() ![]() The suit also names as defendants Creative Artists Agency, Ormond’s former agency, alleging negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, as well as Walt Disney Co. Ormond on Wednesday filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court against the disgraced movie producer for sexual battery. ![]() Six years after the explosive sexual misconduct revelations against Harvey Weinstein triggered the #MeToo movement, a new lawsuit filed against the fallen mogul by actor Julia Ormond seeks to also hold his alleged Hollywood enablers to account.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |